tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26082526.post74715203519654985..comments2024-01-31T10:40:57.896-08:00Comments on Here in America: The Face of JesusSeanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01964168957599835165noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26082526.post-9463080568256655372016-12-13T19:06:58.485-08:002016-12-13T19:06:58.485-08:00Well, Popular Mechanics is hardly the kind of rigo...Well, Popular Mechanics is hardly the kind of rigorous source for this subject matter. Indeed, the claim of forensics rings hollow considering that there is no physical evidence from Jesus Himself to provide grounds for their "forensic" examination. In addition, if that particular type of Jew is what existed in 30 A.D., then the Jews have evolved into the Jewish features that exist today. I doubt that such evolution occurred. So what we have left is some scientists' concept of a Jesus, a concept bereft of true knowledge of His character. EGW has described Jesus as having about Him a sense of power that could not be wholly concealed. That description does not match the bewildered, deer-in-the-headlights stare that these unknowing scientists have given to their fleshed-out idea of what Jesus looked like. I say to them, hands off until they can learn more of what Jesus' character was like so that they could put a more noble expression on his features. Just my two cents......Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26082526.post-3216577634593776442016-12-12T20:11:45.847-08:002016-12-12T20:11:45.847-08:00Beautiful!! ðŸ˜
Beautiful!! ðŸ˜<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com